Hide panel
Ecosystem type
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Land-use challenge
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
NbS approach
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Clear allAbout the libraryGuide
Wetlands
Urbanisation
Wetland and water management

Gelderse Poort Floodplain Restoration & Rewilding, Gelderland, The Netherlands

Location

Gelderse Poort, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands

Status

Project ended

Scale

Landscape level

A 5,000 hectares floodplain located in the upstream section of the Rhine-Meuse delta was restored and rewilded by combining clay extraction, land reallocation, dam removal, naturalistic grazing, species reintroductions, and selective relocations of houses and farms. The project reduces downstream flood risks and associated damage costs, rebuilds delta habitats, and has become a major recreational area, with >1 million visitors per year.

Summer floods in the 1980s highlighted risks of floodplain farming. Being located upstream in the Rhine-Meuse delta, actions here yield system-wide flood-mitigation benefits. The area now forms a connected mosaic of river channels, dunes, wetlands, riparian forest, and open grazing.

Highlights

  • Scale: ~5,000 hectares of connected, rewilded floodplain.
  • Flood risk reduction: Increased water storage capacity in natural ecosystems; reported reductions in local flood-defence spending.
  • Species comeback: Reintroductions of beaver (Castor fiber), otter (Lutra lutra), sturgeon (Acipenser sturio); broader riparian fauna recovery.
  • Geomorphic dynamism: River-dune interactions created a 5 km longitudinal water gradient and diverse aquatic systems.
  • People & place: Tourism increased tenfold, by >1 million visitors per year; education programs engaged >25,000 schoolchildren.

Timeline

  • 1986 - 1993: Plan Stork relaunch; first pilots (by ARK Nature/WWF NL).
  • 1993: Clay-excavation agreements with brickmakers.
  • 1993 - 2008: conversion of >100 hectares agricultural land per year to “living rivers” landscapes; fences removed; introduction of free-roaming horses and cattle; dams removed; access opened to public.
  • 2009: Title and management transferred to Staatsbosbeheer (State Forest Service).
  • 2010-present: Adaptive management continues under rewilding strategy.

About the intervention

A hybrid NbS combining floodplain widening, dam removal, clay extraction to lower surfaces and create new water habitats, naturalistic grazing of free-roaming horses and cattle, targeted reintroductions of native species, and land-use change (including relocations) to restore natural river dynamics and ecosystem functions.

Intervention details

The intervention restored a large floodplain located in the upstream section of the Rhine-Meuse delta, by converting agricultural land into dynamic river landscapes managed through rewilding. Implementation combined land reallocation, clay excavation aligned with river restoration objectives, and measures to restore natural water flow and grazing. The restoration process took roughly three decades, moving from initial small pilot plots to a rewilding landscape of approximately 5,000 hectares.

Land acquisition and reallocation were central to the development of this project. In the late 1980s, a regional NGO federation partnered with farmers to relaunch a land reallocation plan, and a commission was established to coordinate negotiations and embed rewilding principles in landscape restructuring. This reallocation process made agricultural land available for conversion and enabled a stepwise expansion from initial pilot sites to a connected floodplain system.

Early implementation began with small test plots used to trial rewilding approaches, followed by progressive scaling through agreements with neighbouring landowners. From the early 1990s onward, brick-manufacturing companies and conservation actors worked in parallel to excavate clay while renaturalizing river landscapes, in line with the Living Rivers philosophy. As excavation progressed, NGOs removed fences to open up the floodplain and introduced naturalistic grazing using free-roaming horses (including konik horses in early phases) and Galloway cattle. Additional parcels were acquired and added to excavated areas to strengthen ecological interlinkages across the floodplain.

Physical river restoration measures were implemented to restore flow dynamics and increase floodwater storage capacity. Dams were removed and, to create space for more natural river behaviour, 50 houses and 10 farms were relocated. Managers also facilitated the reintroduction of key species, including beaver, otter and sturgeon, as part of the broader rewilding strategy.

The project applied adaptive management to address emerging constraints. As riverine forest regeneration and sand dune development began to restrict river conveyance, managers faced a choice between removing trees and modifying river morphology. They opted to widen restored river channels rather than cut the forest, maintaining rewilding principles while improving flow. Over time, the interaction between restored channels and dune formation generated a 5 km-long water gradient within the system.

Public access and engagement were built into implementation alongside ecological works. Managers promoted access to restored areas, established a Wilderness Café (2001), and delivered field-based education programmes that involved more than 25,000 schoolchildren. Governance responsibility shifted once the land allocation and restoration process was completed: in 2009, title and management were transferred to the State Forest Service (Staatsbosbeheer), which nowadays continues to manage the area using rewilding principles.

Key stakeholders

  • ARK Nature and Stroming Ltd, WWF Netherlands, Gelderse Milieu Federatie
  • Dutch Department of Waterways & Public Works (Rijkswaterstaat)
  • Staatsbosbeheer
  • Brick-manufacturing companies
  • Local communities & farmers, including land reallocation partners, tourism operators, and municipalities.

Financial metrics

Funding sources

  • Initial pilots funded by WWF Netherlands and ARK Nature
  • Land purchases co-financed with brick-manufacturing companies
  • Support from the Dutch Department of Waterways and Public Works
  • Reported outcomes include reduced municipal flood-defence and insurance costs

Budget

  • >€500 million, funded through public-private partnership schemes over the course of decades, including a partial contribution from European Commission

Outcomes

Environmental

  • Climate adaptation: Greater water storage capacity in floodplains and improved natural water flow pathways reduce downstream flood peaks and costs.
  • Ecological health: Improved habitat connectivity, quality and diversity; formation of unique dune-river systems; recovery of multiple native riparian species.

Social

  • Recreation & access: >1 million visits/year; new ferry lines to discover the area; thriving of the local hospitality sector.
  • Education & identity: Field programs for >25,000 students; enhanced well-being and place attachment.
  • Employment: ~200 new jobs vs.
  • loss of ~30 agricultural jobs.

Economic

  • Lower long-term flood-defence expenditures; growth in green tourism; ancillary local investments and services.

Risks and considerations

  • Dynamic habitats can impede conveyance unless channels are adaptively managed.
  • Land-use change required relocations and sectoral transition, from agriculture to services/tourism.
  • Ongoing monitoring (hydrology, ecology, socioeconomics) needs to be formalised and transparent to achieve effectiveness.

Lessons learned

  • Adaptive management is essential: when river forests and dunes slowed flow, managers widened channels rather than clear trees, achieving both hydraulics and scenic value.
  • Partnership model: between NGOs who provide vision, private-sector with technical capacities for clay extraction, and public authorities that can unlock large-scale rewilding.
  • Co-benefits: parallel gains for tourism, education, and identity strengthen long-term support.

Sources

For Reference

  1. Nature-based Solutions Initiative, 2025.

Related EU projects

Information not available yet.