Hide panel
Ecosystem type
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Land-use challenge
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
NbS approach
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Clear allAbout the libraryGuide
Marine and Coastal
Extreme climate events
Wetland and water management

Salt Marshes as Nature-Based Flood Defences in the Dutch Wadden Sea

Location

Dutch Wadden Sea coast (Groningen, Fryslân, North Holland, NL)

Status

Ongoing implementation

Scale

Landscape level

Under the national Delta Programme (2010–2014), the Wadden Region Delta Programme explored integrating vegetated salt-marsh foreshores with dikes to adapt to sea-level rise while enhancing biodiversity and landscape values. Literature syntheses, modelling (e.g., SWAN), stakeholder engagement, and pilots showed that salt marshes attenuate waves and can reduce future dike reinforcement needs—making them a preferred long-term adaptation strategy. A parallel NbS case study concluded that, in many contexts, man-made marshes are more cost-effective than dike heightening when expected breach damages are small to moderate.

The Wadden Sea—one of the world’s largest intertidal systems—buffers the Dutch mainland via barrier islands, intertidal flats, banks, and salt marshes. ~227 km of dikes (plus the 32-km Afsluitdijk) protect the coast, with design standards up to 1/10,000 year events. Climate change threatens higher surges and waves; if sediment supply lags sea-level rise, intertidal flats and marshes can drown, increasing hydraulic loads on dikes. Semi-natural salt marshes (~9,000 ha) already line much of the shore and provide habitat protected under Natura 2000/UNESCO World Heritage frameworks.

Highlights

  • Salt-marsh/dike “hybrid” concept advanced from idea (2010) to preferred strategy (2014) for parts of the Wadden coast.
  • Wave attenuation: Modelling indicates even under extreme water levels (~5.0 m + NAP), a 50–200 m elevated foreland can reduce significant wave height by ~20–37%; under more frequent storms (1/10 yr), reductions up to ~60% are plausible.
  • System-scale modelling: A 600 m salt-marsh zone seaward of dikes could dramatically reduce dike heightening needs by 2050—provided marsh accretion keeps pace with sea-level rise.
  • Cost-effectiveness: For 25 km where marshes were constructed along a dike, analyses found marsh creation more economical than dike raising when breach damages are small–moderate; earthen breakwaters within marshes can outperform pure crest-raising.
  • Trade-offs: Designs optimised for extreme-event protection (higher, more stable marsh surfaces; erosion control) can conflict with peak biodiversity objectives (more dynamic, lower-lying successions).

Timeline

  • 2010: Wadden Region Delta Programme launched (sub-programme of Delta Programme).
  • 2011–2013: Stakeholder consultations; literature & modelling studies; salt-marsh potential mapping.
  • 2014: Salt-marsh integration adopted as preferred adaptation pathway; incorporated into northern water boards’ research agenda (from 2015).
  • Ongoing: Field monitoring during storms; pilots (Building with Nature/EcoShape), BE SAFE/NWO research.

About the intervention

Develop, conserve, and (where suitable) create/raise vegetated salt-marsh foreshores seaward of dikes to dampen waves and complement structural defences. Use sedimentation fields/brushwood dams, earthen breakwaters, and managed grazing to stabilise and shape marshes; ensure marshes can accrete with sea-level rise.

Intervention details

Existing and newly developed salt marshes were explored and used as vegetated forelands to complement the Wadden Sea dike system and reduce hydraulic loading on flood defences. Along the Dutch Wadden Sea mainland and barrier islands, extensive semi-natural salt marshes already existed, largely created through historical accretion works. These marshes were maintained and, where necessary, optimised to stabilise or expand the marsh surface and thereby sustain their flood protection function while remaining compatible with conservation objectives.

Implementation relied on manipulating natural sedimentation and vegetation feedbacks that underpin salt-marsh formation. Historically, sediment accretion on intertidal flats was stimulated by constructing drainage systems in mudflats, planting cordgrass, and building brushwood dams and sedimentation fields seaward of the marsh. Although originally intended for land reclamation, these measures also produced broad vegetated zones that attenuate waves through wave breaking over shallow profiles and friction from vegetation. In the post-1970s shift towards conservation, the size and configuration of sedimentation fields were optimised to halt marsh decline; this coincided with stabilisation and, in some areas, increases in marsh extent along the Frisian and Groningen coasts.

At specific locations, the marsh–dike system was physically integrated in design. A 12.5 km “green dike” section at the Noorderleeg summer polder (completed in 1992) was deliberately designed as a grass-covered dike with adjacent polders and salt marshes, informed by flume studies demonstrating the storm-resistance of a wide vegetated dike/foreland system. In parts of the Frisian coast, summer polders were reconnected to tidal influence either deliberately (by removing sections of a summer dike, as at Noorderleeg) or following breaches (e.g. Paezermerlannen), allowing salt-marsh processes and sediment deposition to continue landward of low seaward defences.

From 2010 onwards, the Wadden Region Delta Programme operationalised this approach through coordinated research and stakeholder engagement rather than a single construction scheme. A coordination group of national and regional governmental bodies and local water boards commissioned literature reviews and modelling, and convened stakeholder meetings to define and prioritise adaptation options. Salt marshes emerged as a priority topic, leading to further modelling (using the SWAN nearshore wave model) to quantify how foreland elevation and width influence wave attenuation under storm and extreme conditions. This modelling was used to translate marsh characteristics into implications for dike design (e.g. potential reductions in required crest height and revetment strength where wave heights are reduced by adjacent forelands).

Spatial implementation planning was supported by a “salt marsh potential map” identifying where marsh development could be pursued based on abiotic prerequisites (notably elevation relative to tidal range, shelter enabling fine sediment deposition, and local hydrodynamics) and biotic constraints (presence of valuable littoral and sublittoral habitats). The map distinguished stretches where salt marshes already occur, where conditions are favourable, and where development would require interventions such as raising elevation via nourishments and, potentially, additional measures to limit erosion or mitigate strong currents and unfavourable depth conditions.

Key implementation obstacles were institutional and technical. Water boards questioned effectiveness during extreme events and raised concerns about maintenance issues (including debris impacts on dike grass cover during storms), while some salt-marsh researchers cautioned about risks to biodiversity and “naturalness” if stability or erosion protection was prioritised for flood safety. A major technical constraint was the limited availability of field data under extreme storm conditions: wave attenuation estimates were largely model-based, with acknowledged uncertainty because models are typically validated using laboratory tests or non-extreme field measurements. Despite these constraints, integration of salt marshes into flood defences was adopted in 2014 as a preferred regional strategy and incorporated into a major dike research programme implemented by northern water boards from 2015. Monitoring of wave attenuation and post-storm indicators (such as debris marks on dikes) was initiated to reduce uncertainty and help reconcile differing stakeholder positions.

Key stakeholders

  • Wadden Region Delta Programme
  • Regional water boards, Rijkswaterstaat
  • Provinces/municipalities
  • Universities, BE SAFE (NWO), EcoShape/Building with Nature
  • Nature NGOs, landowners, farming cooperatives, local communities, tourism operators
  • Trilateral governance via CWSS (NL/DE/DK).

Financial metrics

Funding sources

  • Funded under the Dutch Delta Programme; research supported by programmes such as BE SAFE (NWO)
  • Cost–effectiveness work indicates cases where marsh construction reduces lifecycle costs vs. dike raising

Budget

  • Information not available

Outcomes

Environmental

  • Climate adaptation: Salt-marsh foreshores attenuate waves, lowering loads on dikes, delaying/downsizing reinforcements, and reducing revetment wear during frequent storms.
  • Ecosystem health: Marshes sustain specialized halophyte vegetation and key stopover habitat for migratory waders/fish nurseries; conservation governed by Natura 2000, WFD, Ramsar, UNESCO.

Social

  • Long tradition of grazing and haymaking continues in places (often at low stocking densities to support biodiversity).
  • Recreation & education: Trails, bird hides, centres (e.g., Noorderleeg) and guided excursions enhance public access and support local economies.
  • Stakeholder process: Coordinated with water boards, provinces, municipalities, landowners, NGOs; mixed views addressed via transparent engagement and targeted research.

Economic

  • Potential avoidance of costly dike heightening and reduced maintenance via wave-load moderation.
  • Cost-effective NbS in many settings compared to hard-only upgrades; benefits also include tourism/recreation and ecosystem services, though some are hard to monetise.

Risks and considerations

  • Performance hinges on sediment supply and the marsh’s capacity to keep pace with sea-level rise.
  • Biodiversity versus safety trade-offs require careful zoning and adaptive management.
  • Not all shoreline segments are suitable; ~75 km classified as unsuitable in mapping due to abiotic constraints.

Lessons learned

  • Hybrid grey-green solutions can be technically viable and cost-effective, but field data under extremes are essential to build confidence and calibrate models.
  • Marsh dynamics (erosion/accretion, storm impacts) require over-dimensioning for robust performance and space for nature/recreation.
  • Governance alignment (flood safety, Natura 2000/WFD obligations, World Heritage) is crucial; early, inclusive stakeholder engagement reduces resistance.
  • Design for co-benefits but acknowledge trade-offs; pursue pilot sites that maximise synergy between protection and biodiversity.

Sources

For Reference

  1. Nature-based Solutions Initiative, 2025.

Related EU projects

Information not available yet.