Hide panel
Ecosystem type
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Land-use challenge
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
NbS approach
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Clear allAbout the libraryGuide
Wetlands
Land degradation
Wetland and water management

Large-Scale Restoration and Sustainable Management of Degraded Peatlands in Belarus

Location

Belarus, Eastern Europe

Status

Ongoing implementation

Scale

(Inter)national level

Belarus has undertaken one of the largest peatland restoration initiatives in Europe, rehabilitating over 50,000 hectares of degraded peatlands since 2009. Through rewetting, technical innovation, and strong government policy, the initiative has reduced carbon emissions, halted fires, and revived biodiversity. The project evolved from research and pilot restoration sites into a national strategy ensuring long-term peatland protection and sustainable use.

Belarus, once known as the “land of mires”, possesses 2.6 million hectares of peatlands, over 1.5 million of which were drained for peat extraction, agriculture, and forestry between the 1960s and 1980s. This large-scale drainage caused severe ecological damage, leading to fires, carbon emissions, and biodiversity loss, particularly threatening globally significant species such as the Aquatic Warbler. Following major peat fires in 1999 and 2002, UNDP and the Belarusian government launched a comprehensive restoration programme to address land degradation, mitigate climate change, and prevent further environmental and economic losses.

Highlights

  • Over 50,000 ha of degraded peatlands restored since 2009, with the goal to expand the restoration efforts to 500,000 ha by 2030.
  • National restoration model developed through UNDP–GEF partnership, now applied internationally (Russia and Ukraine).
  • Peatland rewetting reduced CO₂ emissions by approximately 500,000 tons annually.
  • Fires eliminated across restored areas, with immediate reappearance of wetland vegetation and bird species within two years.
  • Development of a national Peatland Restoration Guide and approval of a Code of Best Practices.
  • Adoption of a national Strategy for Sustainable Use and Categorisation of Peatlands (2015), institutionalising restoration and protection.

Timeline

  • 1960 - 1980: Major peatland drainage for agriculture, forestry, and peat extraction.
  • 1999 - 2002: Severe peat fires trigger national attention.
  • 2009: Launch of UNDP–GEF “Peatlands-1” project; technical guidebook developed.
  • 2009 - 2011: 22,397 ha restored at 10 sites under GEF project.
  • 2015: National Strategy for Sustainable Use and Categorisation of Peatlands adopted by the Council of Ministers.
  • 2019: Over 32,000 additional ha restored without donor support.
  • 2030: Target to restore 15% of all degraded peatlands (~500,000 ha).

About the intervention

The Belarus peatland restoration programme focused on rewetting drained peatlands by closing drainage canals and stabilising hydrological regimes. Engineers and ecologists designed low-cost, locally sourced structures to block drainage ditches, restoring groundwater levels and halting peat oxidation. Biodiversity and vegetation rapidly returned, while rewetting significantly reduced greenhouse gas emissions and fire risk. The approach was scaled nationally through the adoption of technical standards and legal frameworks ensuring mandatory rewetting after peat extraction or agricultural use.

Intervention details

The intervention focused on rehabilitating degraded temperate peatlands by restoring their hydrological regime through re-wetting. This approach was selected after research and pilot work showed that drainage-driven disruption of peatland hydrology was the main driver of peat oxidation, recurring peat fires, and biodiversity loss. Early UNDP-supported studies (from 2009) and earlier government–NGO pilot work (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection with RSPB) provided the evidence base for prioritising hydrological restoration as the core technical solution.

Implementation followed a stepwise model: (1) research to define the problem and develop practical restoration methods; (2) on-the-ground demonstration at multiple sites to prove feasibility and effectiveness; and (3) consolidation through national standards and policy to enable long-term maintenance and replication. A multi-disciplinary technical team (hydrology, biology, soil science and economics), led by Dr Alexander Kozulin, developed a national “know-how” for peatland restoration with input from German and British experts. This was formalised as a Code of Best Practices and supported by a technical guidebook describing affordable restoration approaches.

Physically, restoration works centred on stopping water loss from drained peatlands by blocking drainage canals and ditches. The method relied primarily on local materials and local labour, using more solid (including concrete) structures only in a small number of cases. Where needed, the blocking structures were designed to be adjustable so that water levels could be regulated after installation. An algorithm was developed to determine the number and placement of blocking structures based on peatland area, elevation and the condition of drainage ditches. The intervention therefore combined engineering design with site-specific hydrological planning, including land altitude modelling, which was highlighted as particularly important where peatlands had significant elevation differences.

Demonstration restoration was implemented at 10 sites between 2009 and 2011, covering 22,397 ha. The wider programme also tested approaches across 12 disturbed peatlands (28,000 ha) and subsequently expanded, with restoration continuing after 2011 without external donor support. By 2019, an additional 32,000 ha had been restored without donor engagement, contributing to a reported total of over 50,000 ha restored since 2009. The approach was also applied to peatlands affected by forest amelioration, with work underway to restore hydrology at three large raised bogs totalling 3,570 ha.

The intervention leveraged natural peatland processes: raising groundwater levels to halt peat mineralisation and reduce fire susceptibility, while enabling spontaneous recovery of wetland plant communities and associated habitats for waterbirds. The documentation indicates that assisted re-vegetation or reseeding was not required in most cases, as wetland communities returned with the restored groundwater regime.

Key implementation challenges included ensuring cross-disciplinary coordination to agree a sustainable solution for each peatland, and managing technical risks linked to uneven terrain and infrastructure performance. These were addressed through careful altitude modelling, adoption of national technical standards, and post-restoration monitoring of hydrotechnical facilities to confirm they functioned as planned and to repair them when needed. A further practical requirement identified was clear assignment of ownership/management responsibility for the constructed facilities, to ensure ongoing maintenance and compliance with target groundwater levels.

Key stakeholders

  • Government of Belarus (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection)
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
  • Global Environment Facility (GEF)
  • Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB, UK)
  • Greifswald Institute
  • Wetlands International
  • Michael Succow Foundation
  • Coca-Cola Foundation
  • European Union
  • Local peat mining enterprises and regional authorities

Financial metrics

Funding sources

  • UNDP and Global Environment Facility (GEF)
  • European Union
  • GEF Small Grants Programme
  • Michael Succow Foundation
  • Coca-Cola Foundation
  • Government of Belarus

Budget

  • Information not available

Outcomes

Environmental

  • Prevented release of approximately 5.5 tons of CO₂-equivalent per restored hectare annually.
  • Reduced national CO₂ emissions by about 448,000–500,000 tons per year.
  • Complete cessation of peat fires on restored areas.
  • Restoration of hydrological regimes and wetland vegetation within two years of intervention.
  • Return of key species, including Aquatic Warbler, Greater Spotted Eagle, Corncrake, and other wetland birds.
  • Spread of restoration expertise to neighbouring countries (40,000 ha restored in Russia, 3,000 ha in Ukraine).

Social

  • Enhanced community wellbeing through new recreation sites (fishing, berry-picking, eco-tourism).
  • Improved local livelihoods by reducing fire-related health risks and creating restoration employment.
  • Education and capacity building through national guidebooks and cross-sector collaboration.

Economic

  • Avoided tens of millions of dollars in fire-fighting costs annually.
  • Cost-effective restoration model averaging US$50 per hectare.
  • Growth in eco-tourism and nature-based recreation on restored sites.

Risks and considerations

  • Restoration success depends on continuous monitoring and maintenance of water control structures.
  • Time investment is significant—about a decade from initial studies to policy adoption.
  • Financial sustainability requires secure funding for long-term management.

Lessons learned

  • Multidisciplinary collaboration across hydrology, biology, and policy fields is essential for designing sustainable restoration solutions.
  • Demonstrating tangible on-the-ground results is crucial for government adoption of long-term ecological policy.
  • Low-cost, locally sourced restoration techniques can deliver high environmental returns.
  • Assigning clear ownership and maintenance responsibility for hydrological infrastructure ensures long-term functionality.
  • Institutionalising restoration through national legislation secures sustainability and replication.

Sources

For further reading

  1. Panorama Case Study

For Reference

  1. Vergeichik, M. and UNDP, 2025. Belarus’ model for restoration of temperate peatlands. PANORAMA - Solutions for a Healthy Planet, ISSN 2511-7475. Web link: Accessed on January 27, 2026.

Related EU projects

Information not available yet.