Hide panel
Ecosystem type
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Land-use challenge
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
NbS approach
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Clear allAbout the libraryGuide
Marine and Coastal
Other
Wetland and water management

Integrated Wetlands Governance and Restoration in the Gulf of Oristano

Location

Oristano, Sardinia, Italy

Status

Ongoing implementation

Scale

Landscape level

The Maristanis project introduced an integrated governance model and nature-based solutions to protect and restore wetlands in the Gulf of Oristano. By aligning 14 signatories - municipalities and water-management authorities - under the Oristano Coastal Wetlands Contract, the initiative aimed to strengthen biodiversity, reduce climate risks, improve water use efficiency, and balance economic activities such as agriculture, fisheries, aquaculture and tourism.

The Gulf of Oristano is a complex coastal system of rivers, lagoons and salt marshes with high environmental value. It is home to six Ramsar sites, 19 Natura 2000 sites and one Marine Protected Area covering 7,700 hectares along 140 km of coastline. Despite its ecological and socio-economic value, the area faced environmental threats from overexploitation, land-use changes, pollution, invasive species, hydrological alterations, urbanisation, chemical inputs from agriculture, and suffered from fragmented governance across its 11 municipalities. Additionally, climate risks include marine storms and torrential rain causing inland flooding, as well as prolonged summer heatwaves, drought and unpredictable rainfall patterns. Key economic activities such as artisanal fishing, agriculture and tourism often conflicted with conservation needs. The lack of unified management, weak vertical integration with regional and national governance, and limited financial and technical resources led to ineffective and reactive management of wetlands, undermining biodiversity, ecosystem health, and climate resilience.

Highlights

  • Establishment of the Oristano Coastal Wetlands Contract as a legal governance tool, with 14 signatories.
  • Development and already partial implementation of a formal Action Programme with 50 actions.
  • Restoration of 600 ha of wetlands and riparian strips and creation of a bird nesting island.
  • Precision agriculture pilots achieving up to 30% water savings, and reduced fertiliser use.
  • Engagement of more than 400 stakeholders across farming, fisheries, and tourism.
  • Education and awareness-raising with schools and local communities through World Wetlands Day and Coast Day activities.
  • Development of supporting knowledge tools including a vulnerability map and a map of landscape and cultural heritage.

Timeline

  • 2018: Participatory process launched to develop a Wetlands Contract; signing of Declaration of Intent
  • 2019 - 2021: Bilateral and plenary meetings among mayors, provincial officials and the Oristanese Land Reclamation Consortium.
  • 2021: Action programme approved and coordination group established, followed by signing of the Oristanese Coastal Marine Wetlands Contract.
  • 2021 - 2022: First public participation process with local stakeholders.
  • 2023: Second public participation process with local stakeholders.
  • 2025: Update of the Action Programme and coordinated search for funding for actions already included.

About the intervention

The intervention combined ecological restoration, innovative water management, and a new governance framework. Key actions included riparian strip renaturalisation, creation of a bird nesting island from mussel shell by-products, and precision agriculture pilots using drones, satellites, and irrigation technologies. Governance was formalised through the Oristano Coastal Wetlands Contract, aligning 11 municipalities with shared objectives, strategies, and action plans. Stakeholder engagement was central, involving schools, associations, businesses, and public authorities, to ensure local support and sustainable outcomes.

Intervention details

Implementation combined a governance-led integrated management model with targeted restoration and resource-efficiency actions across the coastal wetlands of the Gulf of Oristano. Activities were coordinated under the Maristanis project, led by the MEDSEA Foundation, and spanned governance, restoration (marine and terrestrial), water use and quality, and engagement of agricultural and fishing interests.

Integrated governance through the Oristano Coastal Wetlands Contract
A central intervention was the creation of a joint decision-making framework among the 11 municipalities that include six Ramsar sites and 19 Natura 2000 sites. The municipalities signed a cooperation agreement in the form of the Oristano Coastal Wetlands Contract, grounded in Italian legislation for river contracts (Article 68-bis, Legislative Decree 152/2006). The Contract set shared strategies, guidelines and actions and was used to steer intended outcomes, implementation actions, and monitoring and evaluation. An Action Plan attached to the Contract summarised planned actions (funded and unfunded) addressing priority themes including restoration, climate change, water quality, hydrological risk, and cultural and landscape promotion and valorisation. The governance approach explicitly sought to overcome fragmented wetland management and to progress towards establishing a new regional park as the first objective of the Action Plan.

To deliver this, the project supported a Coastal Contract Technical Secretariat, which accompanied municipalities through the administrative and technical procedures needed to define strategic objectives and actions under the Contract. MEDSEA acted as an ‘honest broker’, working with existing local dynamics rather than imposing new hierarchical structures. A Local Consultation Group was established, bringing together the 11 municipalities, the Province of Oristano, and the Sardinia Regional Administration, and convened multiple meetings with project partners and stakeholders.

Monitoring and evidence-based decision support
To support evidence-based decisions, a Local Wetland Observatory (LWO) is referenced as a mechanism to monitor wetland status and support decision-making. Additional planning and evidence tools developed during delivery include a vulnerability map to visualise impacts and priority areas for mitigation measures, and a map of landscape and cultural heritage drawing on the Regional Landscape Plan database and site data.

Stakeholder engagement and awareness-raising were embedded throughout implementation. Stakeholders were identified through a stakeholder analysis and consulted from relevant public and private sectors, including agriculture, fisheries, tourism and environmental associations. More than 400 stakeholders were involved directly or indirectly. As part of the formal participation process, more than 70 stakeholders took part in nine official meetings presenting the Coastal Wetlands Contract and the opportunities linked to the planned regional park. Engagement methods included individual meetings and public meetings. Schools were engaged through activities linked to World Wetlands Day and Coast Day, including clean-ups, training events, competitions and an educational kit.

Restoration and species support actions
On-the-ground restoration included renaturalisation and restoration of a riparian strip at the Sal’e Porcus pond. This intervention aimed to thicken vegetation along the pond banks to create a filter zone between agricultural land and higher-nature-value areas, improving habitat health and reducing fragmentation. The area benefiting from restoration measures was estimated at about 600 hectares.

A species support measure was the construction of an artificial nesting island for seabirds (terns and laryngites) using waste products from mussel farming. The island had a surface area of 110 m² and incorporated 143 m³ of mussels placed into 1,100 jute sacks. The project identified that outcomes for this nesting support depend on external conditions not directly controlled by the intervention, and that constant monitoring is necessary to adjust or improve the measure.

Precision agriculture to reduce water and input use
A suite of pilot precision agriculture measures was developed to reduce water consumption and other inputs including fertilisers, herbicides and pesticides. Several technologies were tested, with the most successful pilot described as the use of drones to map soils and assess water and input requirements. Precision agriculture measures were tested on more than 200 hectares, mainly using drones on maize and rice cultivation. Additional irrigation-efficiency trials included sub-irrigation technologies tested on 9 hectares of (organic) artichokes and strawberries, and surface micro-irrigation on 3 hectares of carrots. A separate precision agriculture initiative using satellites was developed over 5,000 hectares, mainly for maize cultivated as cattle feed. Reported results from irrigation guided by drone-collected data indicated around 30% water savings and reduced fertiliser use, with the approach described as particularly cost-effective per hectare for large croplands and water-intensive crops such as maize and rice.

Strengthening implementation through self-assessment and corrective actions
During implementation, the project applied a self-assessment using the IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions to identify where delivery could be strengthened. The analysis was carried out by UNEP/MAP SCP/RAC, supported by a consultant from the IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management. The assessment was used to identify indicators that were insufficiently addressed and to generate concrete recommendations and corrective actions for the remaining project period, including prioritising a formal, clear, and well-documented feedback and grievance mechanism and reinforcing participatory decision-making processes that respect stakeholder rights and interests.

Key stakeholders

  • MEDSEA Foundation
  • Mava Foundation
  • UNEP Regional Activity Centre for Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP/RAC)
  • IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management
  • 11 municipalities of the Gulf of Oristano
  • Sardinia Regional Administration and Province of Oristano
  • Marine Protected Area of Sinis, Flag-Sardegna Pescando
  • Local Drainage Authority; Water Agency; Regional Environmental Protection Agency; regional Agriculture Technical Assistance Department; Environmental Department
  • University of Cagliari
  • Fisheries and farming associations, local companies, territorial authorities
  • Niedditas aquaculture company, RisOristano rice producers, 3A farmers’ cooperative
  • Schools, tourism operators, NGOs (e.g., LIPU Oristano)

Financial metrics

Funding sources

  • Mava Foundation
  • Coordinated by MEDSEA Foundation

Budget

  • Information not available

Outcomes

Environmental

  • Restoration measures benefiting an estimated 600 hectares of coastal wetland.
  • Riparian filter-strip renaturalisation at Sal’e Porcus pond to improve habitat condition and water quality, reduce fragmentation, and create a buffer between agriculture and higher-nature-value areas.
  • Artificial nesting island created for seabirds (terns and laryngites): 110 m² structure using 143 m³ of mussels in 1,100 jute sacks.
  • Precision irrigation reduced water use and fertiliser inputs by 30%.

Social

  • More than 400 stakeholders engaged in project activities, out of which 70 participated in 9 official meetings for the Coastal Wetland Contract.
  • 40 participatory meetings with local public and private stakeholders organised in the territory.
  • Awareness raised through school campaigns, clean-ups, educational kits and public events.
  • Improved public recognition of wetlands as part of cultural identity and as natural water retention areas supporting climate resilience.

Economic

  • Precision agriculture pilots provided low-cost, efficient solutions for water-intensive crops such as maize and rice.
  • Governance coordination involved economic actors (including more than 50 main economic companies referenced as part of the actor landscape), aiming to better balance conservation with fisheries, agriculture, aquaculture and tourism.
  • The Contract’s Action Programme includes a Strategic Axis on Green Economy to support a sustainable and responsible territorial development model.

Risks and considerations

  • Bird nesting island success depends on external conditions beyond project control, requiring ongoing monitoring and adaptation.
  • Bureaucratic processes remain a challenge, though the contract has helped streamline coordination.
  • Long-term funding and institutional stability are needed to maintain governance and restoration measures.

Lessons learned

  • Governance reform needs a durable legal anchor: A voluntary but formal Coastal Wetlands Contract, grounded in national legislation and supported by regional guidelines, can create a practical mandate for joint action and help align fragmented plans and policy agendas across municipalities and higher-level authorities.
  • Linking conservation to livelihoods helps unlock buy-in: Positioning wetlands as cultural assets and as nature-based infrastructure for climate resilience helps bridge competing sector interests (fisheries, agriculture, aquaculture and tourism) and supports proposals for green-economy activity.
  • Participation must be structured and accountable: Broad engagement across public and private actors can raise awareness, build legitimacy, and ensure ownership, but it needs clear participation rules, documented decision processes and a formal feedback and grievance mechanism to protect stakeholder rights and maintain trust.
  • Evidence and shared data can depoliticise decisions: Establishing mechanisms such as a Local Wetland Observatory and producing shared vulnerability and heritage mapping can strengthen collective problem definition, prioritisation and the credibility of investment cases for wetland actions.
  • Funding strategy improves when planning is coordinated: A shared Action Programme and coordinated multi-actor governance can strengthen the search for funding by clarifying priorities, packaging actions and creating a platform for investment discussions with both public and private stakeholders.

Sources

For Reference

  1. Etzi, F. and MEDSEA Foundation, 2025. Maristanis: an integrated coastal and wetlands management. PANORAMA - Solutions for a Healthy Planet, ISSN 2511-7475. Web link: Accessed on January 27, 2026.

Related EU projects

Information not available yet.