Hide panel
Ecosystem type
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Land-use challenge
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
NbS approach
Select
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Clear allAbout the libraryGuide
Freshwater bodies and Rivers
Urbanisation
Wetland and water management

Kempen-Broek Wetland Restoration and Rewilding for Climate Adaptation, Limburg Province, The Netherlands

Location

Kempen-Broek, Limburg Province (border between The Netherlands and Belgium)

Status

Ongoing implementation

Scale

Landscape level

The Kempen-Broek project restores a historically drained 15,000 hectares marsh system into a reconnected 2,000 hectares wetland mosaic that acts as a natural flood buffer for downstream cities such as Eindhoven and Den Bosch. Initiated by ARK Nature and partners, the intervention rewilds agricultural lands through rewetting, natural grazing, and fen restoration, while fostering community engagement and cross-border conservation under the UNESCO Man and Biosphere framework. The restored wetland enhances biodiversity, improves water storage by 150,000 m³ per year, and provides recreational and economic benefits to local communities.

Following World War II, much of the Kempen-Broek marshland was drained for agricultural production. However, as climate change increased both drought and flood risks, the region sought to restore the area’s natural sponge function, retaining rainfall upstream to mitigate both floods and droughts downstream. The project became a pilot for the Dutch “Coalition of Natural Climate Buffers”, integrating ecological restoration with regional development, agriculture, and tourism.

Highlights

  • Reconnected ~2,000 hectares of wetland from re-acquired farmland parcels.
  • Restored hydrological coherence and increased annual water retention by 150,000 m³.
  • Introduced naturalistic grazing with free-roaming horses and cattle.
  • Revived old fen systems through sediment removal and rewetting.
  • Supported return of key species, including common crane, tree frog, beaver, wild boar, red deer.
  • Established strong community participation through local storytelling, cultural naming, and access trails.
  • Created one of the richest butterfly and dragonfly populations in the Benelux.
  • Contributed to flood risk reduction, and improved insurance outcomes and local economic diversification.

Timeline

  • 2001 - 2007: ARK Nature initiates farmer engagement; early land purchases and groundwork for land exchanges.
  • 2008 - 2010: National Natural Climate Buffers funding supports pilot restoration works and planning.
  • 2010 - 2015: Scale-up phase, coordination and co-funding from the Province of Limburg, the ARK-led consortium and additional public agencies.
  • 2016 - 2017: Land consolidation completed (12 rounds, 30 landowners, 240 parcels), enabling larger, connected restoration units.
  • 2017 - onward: Land transferred to long-term managers (including Natuurmonumenten and cross-border conservation bodies), and continued expansion to strengthen corridor continuity through the 2020s.

About the intervention

A cross-border rewilding and wetland restoration initiative transforming drained farmland into an ecologically functional marshland network. Actions include rewetting, natural grazing, fen excavation, and parcel reconnection to restore hydrology and biodiversity while reducing flood risks. The project integrates community engagement, economic revitalization, and policy innovation in a multifunctional landscape.

Intervention details

The intervention restored former agricultural land to a functioning marshland-wetland system by reconnecting and rewetting individual farm parcels across the Kempen-Broek area at the border between The Netherlands and Belgium. ARK Nature and partners first focused on acquiring and consolidating “key” parcels that layed between existing nature reserves, so that separate wetland remnants could be joined into a continuous wetland systems. Restoration actions were only initiated once a hydrologically coherent group of parcels had been assembled, so that raising water levels would not negatively affect neighbouring farms.

Implementation combined land consolidation with physical measures to restore wetland hydrology and associated habitats. Drainage infrastructure and fencing were removed, and the landscape was rewetted to rebuild the water-buffering function of the former marsh. In some locations, old fen systems were restored by excavating accumulated sediments. After rewetting, naturalistic grazing was introduced using free-ranging herds of Exmoor horses and Tauros cattle to create a dynamic mosaic of vegetation structures and gradual transitions between woodland and open grassland.

A key enabling mechanism was a structured land reallocation process managed through a consortium model. A land agent organised land reallocation to consolidate “marshy” and “good” agricultural land into viable ecological and agricultural units, working across many landowners and parcels (for example, an early reallocation covered 30 landowners and 240 parcels over 250 hectares). As consolidation progressed through multiple allocations, the coherent wetland area expanded to almost 2,000 hectares (reported as created by 2016). The approach relied on building and maintaining cooperative relationships with local farmers, including prioritizing acquisitions of farms owned by older farmers wishing to stop farming activities, as well as by ensuring that rewetting decisions respected adjacent agricultural needs.

Community engagement was integrated into implementation to maintain local support as the landscape changed. ARK Nature marked milestones through local events, incorporated local cultural references in place naming and on new access gates, and produced a book capturing local oral history. A practical obstacle emerged around public concern about Tauros cattle; this was addressed by replacing Tauros with more docile cattle breeds in areas frequently used for recreation.

The intervention leveraged wetland “sponge” processes to increase water retention capacity and reduce downstream flood risk: slowing, storing and gradually releasing water through rewetted marshes and associated vegetation. Grazing by large herbivores was used as a natural process to maintain habitat heterogeneity and ecological transitions that support wetland biodiversity. In 2017, after acting as a temporary landowner during consolidation, ARK Nature transferred the restored lands to established conservation organisations on both sides of the border for long-term management.

Key stakeholders

  • ARK Nature
  • Province of Limburg (PoL), Dutch Department of Waterways and Public Works
  • Natuurmonumenten (NL)
  • Belgian nature agencies
  • Consortium members: Land agent and green development company
  • Coalition of Natural Climate Buffers
  • biodiversity offset investors
  • Local communities and farmers

Financial metrics

  • €500,000 initial national pilot grant (Natural Climate Buffers)
  • €3 million matching funds from the Province of Limburg
  • €26 million regional development budget delegated to the ARK-led consortium (shared with land and development partners)
  • €4-5 million from biodiversity offsets and supporting agencies
  • Outcomes

    Environmental

    • Climate adaptation: Wetland acts as a natural buffer for floods and drought, by storing water during floods (protecting downstream cities), and slowly releasing water during drought periods.
    • Ecosystem health: Rewetting and grazing re-established diverse natural habitats, including fens, marshes, trouser forests, meadows, and open grasslands.
    • Biodiversity boosted dramatically with return of large mammals, amphibians, and rare invertebrates.
    • Water quality: Restored peat and marsh plants naturally purify water streams and ponds.

    Social

    • Community engagement: Local events celebrate milestones; gates and trails named after regional heritage; oral history published.
    • Economic benefits: Tourism and recreation expanded; increase of property values; improvement of surrounding farms through complementary land-use strategies; new restaurants and hospitality enterprises emerged.

    Economic

    • Increased local tourism and recreation revenues.
    • Reduction of costs related to flood-insurances.
    • Improved rural employment through nature management, ecotourism, and hospitality.
    • Efficient land reallocation doubled public return on investment compared to traditional methods.

    Risks and considerations

    • Balancing recreation, grazing, and wildlife conservation requires adaptive management.
    • Long-term monitoring needed for hydrological and ecological outcomes.
    • Remaining fragmentation in surrounding agricultural lands poses continuity challenges.

    Lessons learned

    • Collaboration with farmers and trust-building activities are critical for voluntary land transitions.
    • Rewetting and rewilding can be cost-effective flood adaptation measures when aligned with agricultural restructuring.
    • Decentralized governance (delegating land management to NGO-led consortia) accelerates outcomes and reduces public costs.
    • Adaptive species management sustains community support.
    • Cross-border connectivity enhances ecological resilience and social identity.

    Sources

    For Reference

    1. Nature-based Solutions Initiative, 2025.

    Related EU projects

    Information not available yet.